Venture capitalists have lost more than $12B in alternative energy – Quad-Cities Online


March 5, 2017 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ Alternative Energy


Dear EarthTalk:

Is alternative energy still the next big thing for American venture capitalists? — Jeffrey Moss, Fairfield, Conn.

Dear Jeffrey,

A decade ago, in the wake of Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” and rising gas/oil prices, many of the same venture capitalists who had made fortunes betting on software, hardware, Internet and biotech start-ups began shifting significant chunks of their investment dollars over to alternative renewable energy and related investments, putting the so-called “cleantech” sector in the spotlight as the “new new thing.”

Given growing global concern about greenhouse gas emissions and other pollution, it made sense that our highest stakes investors would be attracted to placing big bets on little companies jockeying to be the next major players in the fast growing alternative energy sector.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the next round of initial public offerings: the cleantech bubble burst. A July 2016 report from the MIT Energy Initiative states some three dozen U.S. venture capital firms poured $25 billion in cleantech start-ups between 2006 and 2011 — and lost over half their money.

“The results are stark,” the report states. “Cleantech offered a dismal risk/return profile, dragged down by companies developing new materials, chemistries or processes that never achieved manufacturing scale.”

MIT researchers studied the performance of hundreds of cleantech investments and compared the results against medical and software technology investments over the same six-year period. They concluded the venture capitalist model is “broken” for the cleantech sector.

So where did cleantech go wrong? Unlucky timing may have had something to do with it, given the overall market collapse at the end of 2008. But the MIT researchers point out that cleantech start-ups have a longer timeframe of growth than, say, software ventures — and venture capitalists don’t want to wait around 15 to 20 years to cash in.

Also, the cleantech sector suffers from underdeveloped supply chains and an “immature acquisition space” compared to more conventional tech startups, according to the report.

Most of the 150 renewable energy start-ups launched in Silicon Valley since 2006 are long gone.

The flame-out of high-flying solar tube manufacturer Solyndra — after securing $500 million in federal loan guarantees — undermined investor confidence in cleantech, while cheap natural gas and a glut of Chinese solar panel exports undercut the competitiveness of American start-ups in the sector.

Cleantech’s fortunes may be turning around, given an influx of interest in leveraging technology and efficiency to help the U.S. meet its emissions reduction commitments under the Paris Climate Accord.

Just prior to the landmark December 2015 Paris meeting, Bill Gates announced he — with a little help from 27 mega-rich friends such as Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson and Mark Zuckerberg — was launching a new venture fund, the Breakthrough Energy Coalition. The billion dollar fund focused on “fighting climate change by investing in clean energy innovation” represents a new type of venture financing that aims to not only make money, but to help solve social and environmental problems as well.

Gates and company are optimistic that other funders will follow in their footsteps to re-energize American cleantech innovation, create millions of new domestic green jobs and help finally move us beyond fossil fuels.

Comments